Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada Lands Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Canada Lands Company

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable company with nothing online except for primary sources and republished press releases. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've expanded the article somewhat, adding two references (and an additional potential reference) in the process. There appear to be a number of other news and book references available, based on search results from Bing and Google. Mind matrix 14:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 21:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's significant coverage about the company itself including Managing Government Property Assets, the RENX article, and Environment and Planning. Given the scale of this organization I'm sure more can be found. Huge number of incidental references are also out there, definitely more than "primary sources and republished press releases". -M.Nelson (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG per above comments. Mallardsfan19 (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per comment by M.nelson. – BrandonXLF (talk) 04:52, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.